Talk:IOTA (technology)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article IOTA (technology), along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Advert response is invalid
editThe Advert template should not be used. When factual design specifications do not appeal to a specific editor/editors, this does not legitimize the removal of factual information in the context of design implementation. Design information can not be claimed as an advertisement, design information is a factual section which contains specifics, and conceptual information regarding the existing implementation.
If there is a specific sentence, which we can come to consensus as being: "Written as an advertisement", then it should not be included. Removing entire 13 subsections, under the guise of 'being written like an advertisement' can be seen as censorship by special interests.
 | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
The 'Microsoft partnership scandal' appears to violate WP:NPOV. Specifically, no where in the sources does it mention this being a 'Scandal' as denoted in the section title. Additionally, neither source for the passage 'The Iota Foundation was derided' state this.
This section appears to be WP:N however unless sources are corroborate that this was a 'Scandal' it is quite literally WP:NOTSCANDAL. Similarly the Foundation was not derided, as per those sources. Please update sources or reword that passage as this is WP:NOTSOAPBOX.
Note: I have a WP:COI so requested the edit.
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2018
edit | This edit request to IOTA (cryptocurrency) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Market cap
editDear all,
As of now, the market capitalization of the IOTA technology is about $6 Billion.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/iota/
The fact that those three editors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amakuru https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timotheus_Canens
have decided to remove the IOTA wikipedia page yesterday is very disturbing.
Could the page be restored as soon as possible?
Best,
M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micatlan (talk • contribs) 20:43, 24 April 2018
Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2022
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please pardon my mistakes in formatting.
The use of the word 'abused' in the original is grammatically incorrect, suggesting the DDoS attack was abused. The suggested change clarifies the cause and effect.
Please change
During the seed generator scam, a DDoS network attack was abused leaving initial thefts undetected.
to
Early in the seed generator scam, a DDoS network attack distracted IOTA admins, leaving initial thefts undetected.
Oshiri (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Done thanks!.