Talk:IRT New Lots Line/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kew Gardens 613 in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 02:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 02:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Epicgenius: aaaa I forgot to ping you! –♠Vami_IV†♠ 15:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Vami IV, no problem. epicgenius (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kew Gardens 613: Finished my comments. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 12:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  • Livonia Avenue Line[2]:129 This name only occurs once more in the article, with In August 1919, work on the Livonia Avenue Line was suspended [...].
  • Utica Avenue in Crown Heights and continues to New Lots Avenue in East New York. "Utica Avenue" and "New Lots Avenue" should be followed by "station" to distinguish them from the neighborhoods they're located in.
  • except for a short section above East 98th Street What neighborhood is E. 98th in?
@Vami IV: I am ready for more comments whenever you are. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Extent and service

edit

GA progress

edit

Article passes CopyVio scanner. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Images are free/tagged and relevant to the article. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

References are reliable. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.