Talk:ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MarioGom in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit
I think this page should be merged with the far more comprehensive UN Security Council Resolution 1267, which gives the full overview of how the process has evolved over the 8 years it's been in operation. Any comments?Goatchurch 09:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Good idea, I didn't notice that an article on this subject already existed when I started this article. /Slarre 23:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
A merge might not be appropriate anymore, since the Sanctions Committee scope was amended at least twice since the original resolution. --MarioGom (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply