Talk:ISO 31

Latest comment: 22 days ago by Markus Kuhn in topic Merge proposal

ISO 31 isn't always followed strictly. There are many deviations from the various parts of ISO 31 in the scientific and other literature, some of them regional. Example: It recommends "lb" as abbreviation for binary logarithm (log2), and "lg" for 10-logarithm (log10). The author of an American book instead used "lg" for log2. I wrote to him and suggested he followed the standard instead. He replied that he never heard of this standard and thought his notation was better. --Hawklord 21:51, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Coined words

edit

Besides "surface" as an existing term for "areic", there is also the existing word "areal". —DIV (138.194.12.32 (talk) 09:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC))Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ISO 31. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

I propose merging all the parts of ISO 31 back into this main article. The articles for those sub-parts are all stubs, as far as I saw, and I think it is very difficult to add much content or sources to improve them beyond that category. Alan Islas (talk) 13:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The articles on individual parts of ISO 31 should probably be updated and converted into articles on the corresponding parts of the successor standard ISO/IEC 80000, which in many cases are nearly identical. Each individual part of ISO 31 or ISO/IEC 80000 is a quite substantial document containing a large table of quantities and associated conventions, and it would be useful to maintain detailed summaries of these in Wikipedia. Markus Kuhn (talk) 10:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply