This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
untitled
editExamples? --Abdull 16:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Suggest the wiki admin to regulate the article for the following reasons.....
edit- See the following comment
- cur | prev) 02:14, 12 April 2010 222.67.203.108 (talk) (3,239 bytes) (→See also: -- this link should not be disabled until the references of the article are properly cited) (undo)
at
Info from ISO site....
edit- http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43320
- http://www.iso.org/iso/products/standards/catalogue_ics_browse.htm?ICS1=01&ICS2=140&ICS3=20&
It looks that the standard publishing has been messy, as its version control isn't neat at all --222.67.203.108 (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Are the info from .....
editGoogle scholar real.....????...as only few of English publications are there, which is unusual and which is not proportional to the English-speaking population
Info of the topic from general public views.....
editWho and Where are responsible for the standard....???
edit--58.38.41.252 (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
--58.38.41.252 (talk) 06:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
--58.38.41.252 (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
External links
editThe first two links seem to be broken:
- Excerpts from ISO 690:1987 Information and documentation -- Bibliographic references - Content, form and structure
- Excerpts from ISO 690-2:1987 Information and documentation -- Bibliographic references -- Part 2: Electronic documents or parts thereof