Talk:ITV Tyne Tees

ITV Tyne Tees vs. ITV Tyne Tees vs. TTTV

if the current name is ITV1 Tyne Tees, why not rename the article to this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianleck4 (talk • contribs)

The name is Tyne Tees Television, ITV1 Tyne Tees is only used onscreen. AxG ۝۝۝҈ ^►talk_►guests 22:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Additionally, it has been known as Tyne Tees since 1959; the latest rename is very recent comparatively. Wikipedia:Naming conventions, an official policy on Wikipedia, points out that [g]enerally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.

In other words, whilst the majority of people (and sources) continue to use Tyne Tees, so must we. But redirects to it from other names are allowed (and are cheap, so redirect away). As a rule of thumb, I'd say the day the apparent authority on these things acknowledges a change, then Wikipedia should do so. But not until. 〈REDVEЯS〉 22:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

They're not called ITV Tyne Tees

Why does someone keep changing the company name to ITV Tyne Tees??? Ive just looked on Company house and its still Tyne Tees Television Stop changing it lol -anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.248.127 (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

---

Ofcom says different. Paul Austin (talk) 01:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Ofcom says the West country licencee is held by Carlton Broadcasting - Westcountry Region and the anglia licence is held by ITV Broadcasting Limited You gonna change the Westcountry Television and Anglia Television pages because ofcom say that -anon

US Dollars: Why?

Why are US Dollars used in the 1990s section, when this article is based on something from the UK? Just as British English should be used here, as should pounds sterling. Malpass93 (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Maybe the reference is from the US, I would convert it, but it's hard to understand whether the conversion rate is today or from 1993. -- [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 23:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Yorkshire Television - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Correct dates for Idents

Some of the date for the idents may be incorrect and may ref to pres site do have errors, (TV ark etc are all planning to make revised and improve the details but this will take time)

Where is the Tyne Tees logo from 1969?

There is supposedly an image for the 1969 Tyne Tees logo, but there isn't one.--<font style="color:#03FFFF;text-shadow: #0000FF 0.4em 0.3em 0.2em;" face="Courier" size="5">'''WikiAltron64''' </font><font style="color:#FFA500;text-shadow: #0000FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;" face="Courier" size="3">'''talk''' </font> (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

• First Colour Ident: 1969 - 79
• On 24 October 1979, the ident was modified once more to remove the word colour and to give it a more dynamic form up.
• On 5 September 1988, "Flowing Rivers"
• On Friday 1 September 1989 Tyne Tees adopted the 1989 ITV generic look.
• Tyne Tees abandoned it in May 1991. for blocky glass version, with 89 music
• Updated version on Monday 6th January 1992 - Colourful blocky glass with 89 music
• ANOTHER one: white background No idea when used in 1992: May - October 1992
• Monday 5th October 1992 : The silver TTTV ident
• Monday 2nd September 1996 Channel 3 ident: ended 8th March 1998
• Monday 9th March 1998 - 8 November 1998

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ITV Tyne Tees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100731185332/http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/updates/200811 to http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/updates/200811
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211054101/http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/1.510584 to http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/1.510584
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130726234355/http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/ to http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903142247/http://www.transdiffusion.org/tmc/cityroad/studios/cityroad.php to http://www.transdiffusion.org/tmc/cityroad/studios/cityroad.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Tynetees.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

"Rachel Sweeney" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rachel Sweeney has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 24 § Rachel Sweeney until a consensus is reached. Belbury (talk) 10:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)