Talk:IT risk

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The page has been split

edit

Further splitting

edit

Perhaps is better to put laws and standards sections in separated articles because:

  1. The main article IT risk is quite big and can grow: I am planning to add the description to other IT related terms
  2. IT risk management article is quite lengthy and can grow: I am planning to add Risk IT short description and comparison with other methodologies
  3. Standard and law do apply basically to the management of risks, but each standard has to state what is the subject of the management itself i.e. IT risk

Before going on with the splits I would like to have some feedback. Then I can begin the work to updated references in other article properly

--Pastore Italy (talk) 13:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Split content from Information_assurance#Standards_Organizations section to Standard section

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IT risk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IT risk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply