Talk:I Can See the Whole Room...and There's Nobody in It!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• The article is well referenced and written. The only issue I have is the size of lead. Surely it can be expanded upon a bit further.
  • I have expanded the LEAD.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Also, I'm not familiar with paintings, but is there any information about the reception of the painting?
  • I'm afraid that I am not a good enough art student to really parse reception from description on this one. Advice from you or getting a 2nd opinion might help us. Note that I quote a lot of text in the footnotes I don't use in the main body.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Yeah, I say it's fine. Statυs (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• And I guess, one more thing: The information about how much it sold for is not background information.

drive by comment

What about all the non free content contained in the footnotes? MathewTownsend (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)