Talk:I Corps (United Kingdom)

The subject is not clearly defined and it is not clear what the article is talking about. Should be cleaned up. Ori Redler 23:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

First Canadian Army

It says, on the First Canadian Army page that the British I Corps was attached to the First Canadian Army. Can somebody either confirm this, and add it to this page, or dispel this fact and take it off the First Canadian Army page. Climie.ca 18:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Cam

Yes, British I Corps was subordinated to the Canadian First Army during operations in NW Europe until 1 April 1945. After Canadian I Corps arrived from Italy, it joined the Canadian First Army and British I Corps was used to administer the logistics area of 21st Army Group. --W. B. Wilson (talk) 09:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The info post 1981 is not correct I was in 15/19H Div Recce Regt 3 Div we were 33 Armoured Bde alongside 6 Armd Bde which changed to 6 Air Mobile Then into 24 Air Mobile js1 09:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on I Corps (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150705211343/http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201900-2011.pdf to http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201900-2011.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806195614/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Mobilization scheme 1876

I seems like the order of battles for the various MS 1876 corps sould be combined into one page for ease of access. 107.220.180.252 (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned references in I Corps (United Kingdom)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of I Corps (United Kingdom)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "IWM":

• From 4th Infantry Division (United Kingdom): "Uniforms and Insignia – badge, formation, 4th Infantry Division (Show more)". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
   • "Uniforms and Insignia – badge, formation, 4th Infantry Division (Show more)". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
• From Victoria Cross: "The Victoria Cross". Imperial War Museum. Archived from the original on 15 June 2011. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
• From 1st (United Kingdom) Division: "Badge, formation, 1st Infantry Division & 2nd Infantry Brigade". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 17 December 2022.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Missing refs

@Buckshot06: Your edit added references but the full citations are missing; specifically IWM, DeVore, and Kneen & Sutton. —GoldRingChip 16:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Understand; many thanks. Buckshot06 (talk) 11:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Thankyou DuncanHill for doing the reference addition that I should have done. Buckshot06 (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)