 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
For an August 2004 deletion debate over this page please see: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/I saw Poland betrayed
An article on a book should discuss the contents of the book. Instead what I find is the contributor's personal POV repeated, word for word, from other articles e.g. Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies. This article should go unless it can be rewritten to describe the book contents. DJ Clayworth 19:01, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I agree. Adam 22:08, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
But now it is about the book, isn't it? Seaman 23:03, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Like a merry-go-round. That article should be deleted because it resembles this one, while this article should go because it resembles that one... Perhaps one of you could try to un-POV it instead of constant complaining?Halibutt 22:16, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
My comment above was written about a previous version of the article. I'm happy with it now. DJ Clayworth 23:04, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the I Saw Poland Betrayed page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "I Saw Poland Betrayed" page.
