Talk:I See You (The xx album)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I See You (The xx album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Edit war over singles
editAllow me to familiarize everyone with WP:BRD and the concept of discussing disputed edits instead of just reverting each other. The page is protected for two days so you can work this out. If the edit war continues after protection expires, participants will receive blocks. --Laser brain (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- He's been blocked, so we once we revert their edits, we won't have to worry about it.Kellymoat (talk) 00:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2017
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You can add the GIGsoup review under the review section: http://www.gigsoupmusic.com/reviews/album-reviews/xx-i-see/ KonstantinosPappis (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's not a professional review source. Dan56 (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 03:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on I See You (The xx album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oricon.co.jp/rank/wa/w/2017-01-23/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.amprofon.com.mx/top-album.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161127113156/http://www.5music.com.tw/CDTop.asp?top=6 to http://www.5music.com.tw/CDTop.asp?top=6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Removal of lead material by Newzild
editNewzild removed this content in the lead, claiming that only one critic said the album is less insular than the band's previous music. But, "I See You has been touted as the xx’s least insular album thus far." ([1], Kitty Empire in The Observer). This is cited in the article and suggests more than one critic. Furthermore, there are several reviews summarized in the article that support that assertion. a "richer and fuller" quality than on their previous records ... "the most eclectic, multidimensional, and ambitious album of The xx’s young career" ... "the boldest work yet from a band famous for subtlety". isento (talk) 08:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I attempted to communicate this to the editor at their talk page, but it was immediately removed. isento (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)