Wikipedia

Talk:I Thought I Lost You

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleI Thought I Lost You has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2010Articles for deletionKept
July 29, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago15 comments2 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:I Thought I Lost You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 15:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  • song performed by American singer-songwriter and actress Miley Cyrus and actor John Travolta. — This would probably read better song performed by both pop singer Miley Cyrus and actor John Travolta
Since the song is from a soundtrack, stating she is an actress is important, I think. How can that be incorporated. What about "performed by actors and recording artists Miley Cyrus and John Travolta"? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think the two ands struck me as odd, but I'm pretty sure it's actually fine the way it is. CrowzRSA 15:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
O.K. Great :) -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done.

Background

edit
  • Filmmakers asked Cyrus to write a song for herself and John Travolta, who stars as Bolt. reads poorly, consider rewording.
I don't know how. It sounds fine to me. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:23, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • who also produced the produced the track, in a short period of time as they had a due date. also reads poorly, consider rewording.
Done.
  • Cyrus described the writing process as easy. — perhaps something like Cyrus said that writing the piece was "easy."
Done.
  • Before "I Thought I Lost You"'s completion — replace "I Thought I Lost You"'s with song's
Done.
Done.
  • He said, "[The song] so sums up the theme of this film. You know, a dog and its owner and they both were separated, but they love each other so much — there's such an emotional payoff when these characters get reunited, and I think that's what this song's about", he said. — you repeated he said
Done.
  • Lasseter thought that solely "I Thought I Lost You" worked, but it worked better for the film. — replace "I Thought I Lost You" with the song
Done.
  • as promotion for Bolt and its accompanying soundtrack. — to promote Bolt
Done.

Composition

edit
  • Since it also includes its origins, the title should be Composition and origins
It doesn't include origins. What do you mean by origins? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Concept CrowzRSA 22:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
As an lyrical content? That is included in the "Composition". -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 02:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Is "getting lost and getting found, with an overarching theme of loyalty." lyrical content? CrowzRSA 15:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes. In the sense that's someones interpretation about the lyrics. It's not a quote from the lyrics. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception

edit
  • Since its not only "Critical" reception, it should be Reception
There is no commercial reception, only critical reception. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • sounded like an odd love duet because of Cyrus' and Travolta's age difference until he realized the similarity between Travolta and Bolt's voice, as he voiced him. this is better off be a direct quote from the reviewer.
Done.
  • An uncredited review from The Los Angeles Times — Change review to reviewer
Done.

Music video

edit
Not really, it's just that music video synopsis do not need sources, like movie or book plots. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that makes sense... CrowzRSA 22:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Other

edit
Done.

Result

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (No OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Congratulations on the article! From the reviewer CrowzRSA, on 22:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Thought I Lost You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Thought I Lost You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:I_Thought_I_Lost_You&oldid=1205738219"