Talk:Ian Dougald McLachlan/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Anotherclown in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Progression
edit- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
edit- Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
- Disambiguations: none found - [3] (no action required)
- Linkrot: Ext links all work - [4] (no action required)
- Alt text: Images all have alt text - [5] (no action required)
Criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Although this article is currently going through an ACR I have reviewed the article and IMO it easily meets the GA criteria. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)