Barberini Dyptych

edit

I am removing this picture, since according to Early Christian Art and Architecture, by Robert Leslie Pollington Milburn, it is either Anastasius I or Justinian and there is no mention of the Sassanids or Persians.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead section

edit

I expanded the lead section. I will removed the “Lead too short” template for now. Any objections? Dorromikhal (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Persian victory?

edit

The Persian victory conclusion was based on a source that talks about something else. The source does not say that the Persians won the war.If you read carefully it means that in Khavad's perspective it was for him a signal victory because he was able to hold the throne despite having many external and internal problems.But the campaign itself was hardly decisive and it ended only after the death of Khavad, so we cannot conclude this war as a clear Persian victory. How was it a victory for Khavad, when the war was concluded only after his death?It doesnt make any sense to me.. Either show a better source who mentions specifically that the war ended in a Persian victory, or we should remove that part. 94.217.236.138 (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Byzantium did not pay tribute+result Inconclusive

edit

Byzantium did not pay any tribute to the Sassanians. During peace negotiations Byzantine diplomat Rufinus at first actually agreed on the payment of money (11 thousand pounds of gold), but after a while, he agreed that Byzantium would retain Lazic, the Sassanids would retain Iberia, and Rufinus would return all the money that Byzantium Already paid (out of those 11 thousand pounds of gold).Source:The Romans eastern frontier and the persian wars.Part II(363-630 AD). Geoffrey Greatrex & Samuel N.C. Lieu.pages 96-97 Gypsygreek (talk) 06:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@GoldRomean Gypsygreek (talk) 08:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply