Talk:Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    In the Background section, "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill}' has a corresponding dance moves designed by Jamal Sims", this sentence doesn't make sense. Do you mean ---> "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)' has corresponding dance moves designed by Jamal Sims" or something like that?
    Check.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
    In the lead and throughout the article, example "It was released on June 30, 2009 by Walt Disney Records as a promotional single" commas after dates, if using MDY. In the Background section, "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill}'" ---> "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)'".
    I don't understand the first part about the commas. As for the title, it is fixed. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 05:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I got it and check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    Reference 3 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
    I don't understand. I clicked the link and it sends me to the page directly. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 05:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
    It does send you to the page, but the url link has changed, and check.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you to Ipodnano for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply