Talk:Ichi-go ichi-e

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Pop culture

edit

While the "Heroes" and "Forrest Gump" references are quite interesting; listing Japanese shows and anime that feature the term "ichi-go-ichi-e" is really quite silly because it's a common Japanese term. It would be like listing all the American shows and books and comics that use the term "once in a lifetime"... you would never do that because it's just not noteworthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.216.12.89 (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

How come bots continue to remove the link to the Japanese wiki? This is a Japanese term; it makes sense that the Japanese version should also be linked to. -Rikoshi (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ichi-go ichi-e. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply