 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Move to Wiktionary
editAs I said about the iconoclast article, it is not much more than a detailed dictionary entry. This article does not look like it is going in a encyclopedic directior or has the potential to do so.--chemica 21:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- I beg to differ. It's a stub, not a dicdef. The history of iconodulism and famous iconodulists could be included in the article (not that I know the subject myself). 25 articles on iconodulism or iconodulists already link to this article, so it is in need of expansion, not deletion.--Father Goose 21:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Merge
editSurely it should be merged with Byzantine iconoclasm since it adds very little if anything to that page, and is actually at odd with that page. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- But is the use of the word entirely restricted to Byzantines? I think not. Johnbod (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Softening on this .... Johnbod (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)