 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is there a more attractive icosagon available for illustration? (A regular icosagon would be nice)-FZ 18:25, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
So is an icosagon necessarily regular as this article states, and then quickly contradicts? Wil (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
I cleaned it up, removed claim that it IS regular. Tom Ruen (talk) 23:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
LoL! It's a circle :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.102.49.59 (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)