Talk:Icositetragon
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Double sharp in topic Skew icositetragons in antiprisms
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Delete article?
editI think this article should be deleted. No content at all that isn't copied straight from Polygon. Anyway the page should be at Icositetragon. Double sharp (talk) 11:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. It's just a stub; it can be developed. Also, Wikipedia generally favors having articles, even short ones, on discrete topics, over having a long article with lots of well developed subtopics. If this article is developed, it may be appropriate to remove some duplicate content from Polygon. —Finell (Talk) 22:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to polygon, or delete. Is there anything special about icosikaitetragons except for the facts that they have 24 sides, what their angles add up to and what each of their internal angles are? Chiliagon and myriagon had slightly more content than this because of Descartes' usage of them in his Sixth Meditation. But they were both redirected to polygon. There isn't even an image of an icosikaitetragon here. Double sharp (talk) 02:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Skew icositetragons in antiprisms
editThe pictured antiprisms appear to have octagrammic rather than dodecagrammic bases. Double sharp (talk) 07:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)