Wikipedia

Talk:Ida Noddack

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

contradiction ?

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

"her suggestion that the nucleus breaks into several large fragments is not what occurs in nuclear fission" seems to be contradicted by the wiki page on nuclear fission: "nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits into smaller parts (lighter nuclei)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.183.32.144 (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are correct in pointing out that contradiction. The original German quote in her 1934 paper reads „daß bei der Beschießung schwerer Kerne mit Neutronen diese Kerne in mehrere größere Bruchstücke zerfallen“. This is consistent with the modern understanding of nuclear fission. I have, accordingly, removed the contradicting statement from the text.
P.S.: While I am a native German speaker and physicist, I'm NOT a member of Miss Noddack's fan club! ;-) -- HH 85.180.183.233 (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am not a native speaker of German or English but to me the intent of mehrere/several usually seems to be "more than two" and this would contradict "Most fissions are binary fissions" in the nuclear fission article. I am not saying she shouldn't be credited for the idea but it does look like she had a more destructive type of break-up process in mind. AlexFekken (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

odd bias

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this article reads like it was written by the president of her fan club. all the references are to things written by her--surely something is wrong here. if she was a company, i'd say that this article reads like an advertisement, since its entire purpose seems to be to promote her as the world's greatest and most under-appreciated chemist. -69.47.186.226 19:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, a "bibliography" section typically contains works authored by the person in question, i.e. primary sources. Hence I see no problem whatsoever arising from what you're complaining about, especially since one of the charms of science is their being based on empiricism and math. So if you happen to find any errors in one of the subject's publications, feel free to publish your research and add a reference to it in the appropriate section of this Wikipedia entry. -- HH 85.180.183.233 (talk) 21:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nice book

edit

Hook, Ernest B. (2002). Prematurity in scientific discovery: on resistance and neglect. University of California Press. pp. 124–148. ISBN 9780520231061.

Missing

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can somebody explain this?

"the detection limit of Noddacks' analytical method could have been 1000 times lower than the 10−9 value reported in their paper,"

I get it she reported a result more/less correct, but not the significance of the detection limit. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Date of death

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I cannot find a reliable source stating her date of death. The German wikipedia, as well as numerous other sources such as Encyclopaedea Britannica (http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1757811/Ida-Noddack) and RSC (http://www.rsc.org/education/eic/issues/2009March/ida-noddack-rhenium-nuclear-fission.asp), state that she died on September, 24th. Femkemilene (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ida Noddack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ida Noddack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ida Noddack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ida Noddack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ida_Noddack&oldid=1209241824"