Talk:Identified

Reference link?

Not all references are available online. In this case, the reference is a Radio Disney interview, cited as {{cite | title=Interview |date=2008-04-11 | publisher=Radio Disney | author=Vanessa Hudgens}}. If you have to verify it, a quick search on Youtube will pop up with several pirated copies. Hopefully, Radio Disney will release it as a podcast in a few days.Kww (talk) 02:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

A reference that gives complete information to verify the information does not need a web link - example books, newspapers, journals. See WP:REFERENCE. A link is just strongly desired to ease verifying the info and is necessary if the information is on a web source. See also discussion on talk:Vanessa Hudgens and WP:Articles_for_deletion/Identified. Original link was a prohibited link to a youtube copyright violation. This reference shows the information is valid and is the best we can get for now. Yeah a link would be great and this reference will be replaced when one is available. --NrDg 02:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

btw this site is claiming that her album got 2.5/5 stars on all music guide and 2.5/5 stars on blender. i checked both the links provided to get to the site, and it seems that her album got 3.5/5 stars on all music guide, and 3/5 stars on blender. this needs to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsupporter298 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Trash Me

The song 'Trash Me' is listed as the thirteenth track with the confirmation link being amazon.com. If you follow the link and scroll down to the tracklisting, 'Trash Me' isn't listed. I don't know if this is Amazon's mistake of not adding it, somebody editing it because they knew she recorded a song with that title, or a bonus track. Should we take out that song on the tracklisting? MusicBoi94 (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Release date

is it June 24 or July 1? May 21 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.30.225 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Either way find a verifiable reliable source WP:V WP:RS that supports it. --NrDg 23:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The release date is June 24, 2008 but some idiot keeps changing it to July 1, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.76.144 (talk) 00:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

no i think it's really July 1, 2008 becuz on some of her websites it said it had been changed.

                                  May 22.2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.30.225 (talk) 00:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)  

yea it is July 1. skyroo.com's pre-order site says 'available July 1' or something like that.MusicBoi94 (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Charts

The Charts section of this article is all messed up. Not the info, but Vanessa's infobox and the references are all merged into a box. Can someone fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68DANNY2 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Second single from Identified.

The second single from Identified isn't Hook It Up! It's Identified which Vanessa confirmed herself that it was the next single in a concert in Alabama. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jraz1206ablao (talk • contribs) 00:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Its really true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.28.13.158 (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, its true. After she sung it at the concert in Alabama, she told the fans that "Identified" was the next single, and asked if the fans agreed with the fact that it'll be the next single, and they all said yes.

yep! go to http://youtube.com/vanessazacky817! and click the video with the title "identified is the second single (audio only)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikodabest (talk • contribs) 07:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

A YouTube video posted by who knows who is not a reliable source. I could go in right now, upload a video, and title it "second single" with a totally different song. Metros (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Have you ever tried listening to it? It's her saying her next single! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikkokalabud (talk • contribs) 01:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually they changed it from "identified" to "Amazed"........So "Amazed" is next single because on Radio Disney it was played and it got a high percentage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.4.208 (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Just because they put a song on Radio Disney, doesn't mean it's the next single. Even when they put it on Radio Disney, Vanessa herself said that Identified was her next single during her 'Identified' Summer Tour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jraz1206ablao (talk • contribs) 00:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Identified? Amazed? First Bad Habit?

This has been to far for me. First, Vanessa said that "Identified", and asked if they (fans) all agreed in the concert in Alabama. Next, a site said it was Identified. And finally, a blog said that it was "Amazed" and another site confirmed "First Bad Habit"! But, Vanessa is the one who have the choice. --Pedrovip —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovip (talk • contribs) 17:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

This is why we have a policy of not adding things based on blogs, fansites, and rumors. Until there is something announced by a reliable source like her record label, no one should be adding anything about her next single.—Kww(talk) 18:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

There has been TONS of debate over what the next single will be, but it looks like any plans for another single have been scrapped, it's been a long time since Sneakernight premiered, and it looks like they're just promoting the song "Amazed" on Radio Disney as the second single.

Why did you write like next Vanessa's album REVOLUTION? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.14.209.121 (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Trying to ensure the article title appears as Identified in italics

This article name is Identified, in italics. I want to make sure it appears that way, so that it is unique. There is another article under review, about a company named Identified (not in italics). It is totally unrelated to this article. The company is in the field of data management and analysis, so I don't want it to seem like a duplicate of this. I think I may need to use the disambiguation protocol though. Just wanted to explain what I was doing here, as this article has a long history, including some unexplained changes. --FeralOink (talk) 13:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)