Talk:If (preposition)

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Proposal to split

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article would be better retitled "If (pair of syntax-related homonyms)". Such a title would of course be more conspicuously ill-suited to an encyclopedia, but a lot less misleading than "If (conjunction)", whose purported subject "isn't a thing".

Far better, the article should be split into "If (preposition)" and "If (subordinator)".

If "If (conjunction)" is split, what should happen to it? It could be moved to either If (preposition)" or "If (subordinator) -- and one might as well toss a coin to decide -- but with no redirect. Whichever it isn't moved to would be the recipient of material taken out from the old article. There are so very few articles that link to "If (conjunction)" that each link could and should be edited, whether to the preposition or to the subordinator article. (Links from non-articles can be ignored. The article Philippians 2 has a rare and rather surprising example: from the word "conditional" within "Meyer notes Paul's use of 'four stimulative elements', which are assumed to apply and are not conditional".)

Comments? (Brett?) -- Hoary (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support Brett (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the quick reply, Brett. All done! -- Hoary (talk) 00:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic