Talk:Ignacio Zaragoza

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wchristopher25wooster.edu. Peer reviewers: Marsx25, Casey 977, Ezbreezyy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

IPA: Spanish pronunciation

Who the hell does these? They sound nothing like Spanish, they sound like an american with terrible Spanish, I've come across many of them I'll take the liberty to correct this one

Instead of [iɣˈnasajo saɾaˈɣosa] it should be [iɣˈnasio saɾaˈɣosa] This being of course, the way it's pronounced in Mexico 187.133.43.58 (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Correction

I removed the racist comment someone placed on the article calling GEN Zaragoza a wetb***Kmerian (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I just changed the part where his great accomplishment was having "huge hairy butt cheeks." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.93.53.132 (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I intend to to edit this article by expanding the content about Zaragoza's political career, and adding more sourced information.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

He was best known for his 1862 defeat of invading French forces in the battle of Puebla on May 5th.(the Cinco de Mayo). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.170.111 (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

There's a bit more info on the Spanish language page. Is it okay to copy from the Spanish one to the English one? 217.166.94.1 (talk) 13:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality issue

This article does not seem to take a neutral POV with things such as how they never had another general as great as him or just in general romanticizing his life instead of being informative. It does have information in it, but the article as a whole is heavily biased towards making him a hero. While he did do these things, it doesn't seem like a wikipedia article saying how no general could be better than him or how he knew the moment he was born he would work for the government. 104.169.85.80 (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)