Talk:Ignatius Park College
Latest comment: 18 years ago by FreplySpang in topic Sources verifiable.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you want to add something to this article, please note
editUnsupported claims about this subject are likely to be removed quickly. FreplySpang (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Please take note of our policies on sources: Wikipedia:Reliable sources and verifiability: Wikipedia:Verifiability . Personal anecdotes are not sufficient for our needs. You may be telling nothing but the truth, but if other editors can't double-check your claims, we can't use it. FreplySpang (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Sources verifiable.
editall of the information about Ignatius Park College is correct, especially myself being a student at the college.
but anyway a source would be the college's website: [1]. Gertzy
- Right, yes, thank you. The problem is that, in the past, we have had people adding unverifiable rumours and so forth to the page. The above note is intended as a warning to them to stop. FreplySpang 03:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, no problem, I thought you meant that the whole article was not verifiable, but I understand now, sorry about that. Gertzy 10 June 2006
- No problem :-) I've added a header that should make that clearer. FreplySpang 14:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just a quick note, looking at the History log, I believe that the Users Mco, Bde, and RandomLad, are actually teachers at the college, Mco being Principal Michael Conn. I believe Mco's contributions should have been allowed as his contributions were actually getting rid of the negative comments and is actually a source himself, as a principal and alumni of the college. I would be able to input some allowable information but would only be considered a sencondary source of its own as a current student of the college. Gertzy 11 June 2006