Wikipedia

Talk:Ike Skelton

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there a family relationship between Ike Skelton and Red Skelton? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.154.225 (talk) 17:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Highly Suspect

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have come to find that several contributors are from the U.S. House of Representatives (143.231.249.138), meaning that Ike or one in his employ has been embelleshing his article. Another IP comes from Headquarters, USAISC (134.240.241.3), also known as West Point which is also in suspect as Ike is chair of the Armed Services committee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilikenwf (talk • contribs) 02:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wait a minute, it's the "powerful" house armed services committee! Seriously, great sleuthing work! It is editors like you that make this encyclopedia a great one. CriticalChris 02:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Remarried

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A few months ago it was briefly mentioned on the local news that he remarried. The article should be updated, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.217.194 (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Voting with Democratic Leadership

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I can't find a neutral, factual source to support his opponent's assertion that Skelton has "voted with Nancy Pelosi 95% of the time." Am going to replace with data from current Congress for now. Arbor832466 (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

We have had this discussion before. It is better practice to edit an addition instead of simply completely removing an addition. I put back in his opponent's comment because I provided a reliable source to back up the opponent's statement and the opponent's claim seems to be fairly correct based upon the number that you added to the article. So I really do not see the reason on why you removed it lock, stock and barrel. It was a notable, reliable sourced addition that was written in NPOV manner. All that I changed in this version is that I named the opponent. But overall, I kept the former information because as your own work indicates Skelton's opponent's comments are right on the mark. You probably should have worked with my original edit instead of completely removing it. Skelton's opponent's number (95%) is statistically insignificant from the numbers that you found. Also, you added a personal claim by you that Skelton "making him one of the most conservative members of the Democratic Caucus." The source that you cited (Washington Post) does not state that claim. It is simply your personal opinion about Skelton's voting record. Please review Wikipedia:NPOV tutorial. In light of your lack of a source and it merely your opinion, I also removed your commentary to restore the NPOV tone that the article previously had.--InaMaka (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your interest in the Skelton article. I added some more info supported by the Washington Post source to give a point of reference to the voting with party leadership percentage. That statistic is based on every single vote that Congress takes, including procedural motions, naming of federal facilities, resolutions honoring individuals, teams and organizations, and many other bills that pass unanimously or nearly unanimously, so it can be misleading to a reader without a fairly detailed knowledge of Congressional procedure. In fact, a majority of both parties vote together approximately 50% of the time. Arbor832466 (talk) 15:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ike Skelton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ike Skelton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ike Skelton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ike_Skelton&oldid=1257833523"