Talk:Iksal

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Davidbena in topic Archaeology


Crusader era

edit

Nothing is mentioned about Iksal in Pringle, Secular buildings, or Churches, either vol 1 or 4 (where Iksal would have been). Same for Ellenblum, Rural settlements. Huldra (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

1922 census

edit

The pal.rem site has messed up on the 1922 data, it gives it as 261. It should be 621! Huldra (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iksal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Archaeology

edit

User:Davidbena, I'm not sure how useful the info, say that Permit # A-6637 was given for Archaeological excavations is. Isn't it better to say what the excavation (given here: Mokary, 2014, Iksal) actually brought forth?

I have added a lot of links to various hadashot-esi.org.il articles over the years...many of them I haven't "written out" yet, but are just there in the Biblio section. Feel free to expand! Huldra (talk) 23:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think that both would be good to add. The reason for citing the "Survey Permit number" is so that if people, in the future, wish to check the information on that particular archaeological dig, they can do so by submitting the IAA details.Davidbena (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply