Talk:Ilayathambi Tharsini
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citation removal
editPlease discuss before removing citationsRaveenS 14:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
The removal on Tamilnet with false accusation is vandalism. The said user is trying to revert with the misconception that Tamilnational is Tamilnet. However, it is not. You can take a look at this. Watchdogb 12:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Please don't add bias crap sites like tamilnet or tamilcanadian. And please respect good Wikipedian's opinion. Iwazaki 会話。討論 14:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Go talk if over if Tamilnet is actually a Bias source... Neutral editors have agreed it is RS
Removal of Tamilcanadian
editNo one argues that Tamilcanadian is an unbiased source or even RS source but what it is a potential mouth piece of actions of the LTTE. In this article a front that is alleged to be LTTE claims that it killed 15 naval men in memory of her rape and murder. In reality according to RS sources LTTE denies ever killing the naval men :))
Now if Taliban posts in a news website that officially denies it ever killed number of NATO soldiers in revenge for this is or that action by the NATO in Afghanistan and a potential mouth piece goes on to say infact it did kill the NATO soldiers shouldn’t we include that information ? For example the following cites allude to it but not directly[1], [2], [3] , we need the information from the horses mouth and we have it Tamilcanadian. Taprobanus 13:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- More cites if people are interested in improving it[4],[5],[6],[7]Taprobanus 20:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)