Talk:Illusory superiority/Archives/2017

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Historical superiority of India

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In all writings in India, there is an undercurrent of claim that they are traditionally the greatest in all things. Be it science, philosophy, maritime trade and intellect. There is much proof to show that also. The whole world practically runs on the intelligence of the people of India.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.97.8.23 (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2017‎

I think you'll find that was true only until the Australians took over. --Epipelagic (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Since the article is about people (individual behavior), I don't think that countries, nationalism or historic claims are part of the topic. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 17:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Illusory superiority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225074430/http://improb.com/ig/ig-pastwinners.html to http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-pastwinners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)