Talk:Ilyushin Il-32/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 00:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a very simple article, with therefore very little to review. I do have a couple of concerns regarding the need for citations and the infobox image:

• Opening sentence: "The Ilyushin Il-32 was a Soviet heavy military glider developed after World War II to deliver 7,000 kg (15,000 lb) of cargo, including 60 troops or a 122 mm (4.8 in) cannon with its prime mover, ammunition and crew." I know the 60 troops are mentioned in the specifications, but nowhere else in the article is the cannon mentioned. It should be discussed in the body, with a citation.
• The specifications need a citation.
• The licensing of the image File:Il32-i.jpg needs to be improved; it certainly wasn't taken in 2004. The file either needs to be shown to be PD, or a fair-use rationale needs to be provided.
  • Note that I have tagged the image for deletion at Commons, but I have saved a copy locally to be re-uploaded at en.wp with a FUR if necessary. –Grondemar 00:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
    • All done, image transferred to en.wiki.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This review is placed on holdfor a minimum of seven days pending resolution of the above concerns.

Thanks. –Grondemar 00:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for addressing my concerns above. I will now pass this article as a Good Article. Congratulations! –Grondemar 23:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)