This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Il-54-sila-1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Il-54-sila-1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
Unclear
edit"The delegation was told that the Il-54 was the Il-149, as part of a deception programme. As a result, the Il-54 was assigned far more importance than it actually warranted, "
I am unclear on how calling the plane one name instead of another garners it far more importance. It seems something is missing here. Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think it's referring to it being shown to the delegation in the first place, which is the sentence before what you've quoted. Howee, as written, it's unclear what role the fake designation had, if any. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the original source. BilCat (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)