Talk:Immigration to Pakistan
Immigration to Pakistan was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 25, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that up to 2 million illegal immigrants are estimated to live in Pakistan's commercial capital Karachi alone? |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demographics
editKeep expanding this table using reliable sources. --Saki talk 11:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Country | Number of immigrants | |
---|---|---|
Afghanistan | 2,000,000[1] | Afghans in Pakistan |
Bangladesh | 2,500,000 - 3,000,000[2] | Bangladeshis in Pakistan |
Iran | 20,000 - 120,000[3] | Iranians in Pakistan |
Tajikistan | 1,200,000 | Tajiks in Pakistan |
Burma | 200,000[4][5] | Burmese people in Pakistan |
Arab World | Uknown | Arabs in Pakistan |
United Kingdom | 47,000[6] | Britons in Pakistan |
Armenia | 40,000 | Armenians in Pakistan |
People's Republic of China | 10,000[7] | Chinese people in Pakistan |
United States | Unknown[8] | Americans in Pakistan |
Philippines | 3,000[9] | Filipinos in Pakistan |
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Immigration to Pakistan/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- A few typos I'm correcting. Lead might need some rewriting?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No references in "Demographics", but otherwise very good
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The article essentially describes current immigration patterns, but gives little information about background: Why are there only two short sentences about immigration before 2001? The article completely neglects historical immigration; No information about public opinion; Not much information about the effects the immigration has had
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Reasonable
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Only one image; if you can get any more it would help. No alt text, but that is not required for GA
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Fail for now: Not convinced about completeness
- Pass/Fail:
References
- ^ Pakistani TV delves into lives of Afghan refugees - UNHCR
- ^ By Abbas Naqvi (December 17, 2006). "Falling back". Daily Times. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
- ^ Nasr, Vali, The Shia Revival (Norton), 2006, p.78
- ^ Homeless in Karachi - Outlook India
- ^ SRI On-Site Action Alert: Rohingya Refugees of Burma and UNHCR’s repatriation program - Burma Library
- ^ "Brits Abroad". BBC News. Retrieved 22 January 2010.
- ^ Fazl-e-Haider, Syed (2009-09-11), "Chinese shun Pakistan exodus", Asia Times, retrieved 2009-09-11
- ^ Private American Citizens Residing Abroad, Bureau of Consular Affairs, 1999, retrieved 2009-09-17
- ^ "Philippines monitors condition of Filipino workers in Pakistan". M&C. Nov 5, 2007. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
War on Terror
editno need to compare pakistan to india or that immigration is low due to war on terror because A) war on terror has had no effect on immigration to pakistan B) indian page does not talk about war in kashmir, or ne india or anti immigrant views in mumbai —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.250.215 (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Immigration to Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100326040310/http://www.overseasdigest.com/amcit_nu2.htm to http://www.overseasdigest.com/amcit_nu2.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1371134.php/Philippines_monitors_condition_of_Filipino_workers_in_Pakistan
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)