Talk:Impeachment March
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Opencooper in topic Spoken Wikipedia
![]() | Impeachment March has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 11, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Impeachment March article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | There is a request, submitted by --Another Believer (Talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Good article on English Wikipedia". |
Spoken Wikipedia
edit@Opencooper: I think the spoken Wikipedia recording you've removed is better than nothing. Why did you remove? Has there been a discussion about these being problematic? ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- From their recent contributions it looks like they are mass-removing these recordings... Funcrunch (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- See also:
- I dunno, I feel like this needs more discussion. I don't see why these are so problematic, at least until someone makes a human recording. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: You say you don't see a problem with this recording, but did you actually listen to it to assess its quality? Right off the bat, it can't even say "protest" right. The emphasis on every single word is off. This was only after listening to half a minute of it. Opencooper (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)