Talk:Impenetrability

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Modern philosophy

Is this a joke?

With a redirection to this from FR Quantum physics page, I didn't expect what is essentially a blank page not even worth one symbolic point for the ink, because of the Internet...

Thinking of all the ones who'll consider "it must be true if there's an internal EN source" without even reading it (because many just don't go read anything not in their native language) and finding it is actually an arbitrary declaration without anything to back it up, I'm quite horrified.

On the other hand, all you can learn on the FR page linking here is the concept of fractal endless replication, which indeed counters the impenetrability concept by having multiple similar occurrences happening in a given place at the same time, depending on observation scale. --2A01:CB11:13:D700:81A9:8D61:4B2A:188B (talk) 12:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic