Talk:Imperator: Rome

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Software release life cycle#Open and close beta|open beta]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Professional critics protection?

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Is it common policy for Wikipedia that owners and users opinion is inferior to professional critics opinion, who are paid for what they write? There should be at least mention about criticism of game from users, if you want to have good POV.--86.49.104.67 (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

2601:246:100:9ec9:29bf:6af9:f9c1:e83b : on wikipedia is probably forbidden (we should look in rules) present/write user reviews. Do not know why, but its happening.--86.49.104.67 (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

On Wikipedia, user generated content is not allowed. User reviews are user generated content. -- ferret (talk) 13:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why is this so hard to understand? If we allowed this sort of content, then people could personally write their own reviews and then cite them back here. It's a massive WP:COI and WP:N issue. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic