| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imperial Way Faction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Difference?
editWhat's the distinction between Kodoha, Kodo Ha, and Koda Ha?
- Kodoha and Kodo Ha would be the same in Japanese (no upper case, no spaces in written language). Charles Matthews 18:28, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Merge
editThe article British diplomatic movement also political struggle between Toho Kai and Kodoha groups in 1942 has been merged into this one: the original article is preserved at Talk:Imperial Way Faction/Merge archive. Physchim62 (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
I propose to move
editthis page to kodoha. "Imperial Way Faction" is the direct translation of Kodoha(皇道派), which is a proper noun. - Ideru 00:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Revision
editThe article has been considerbly revised and is now referenced. It is now specific to the Kodoha army political faction and its disagreement with the Toseiha, and extraneous paragraphs on Hideki Tojo and his conduct of the Second World War have been removed as irrelevant. Tojo was a member of the former Toseiha, not the Kodoha. Also, the Kodoha ceased to exist after the February 26 Incident, and discussions on politics and conduct within the Army post-1936 belong elsewhere--MChew (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)