Talk:Impossible Whopper/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 07:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Quite surprised to see you with no GAs after coming across your work multiple times at DYK over the years. I do hope you consider reviewing; we need more reviewers badly! Read through copy before stopping for the night...will spot check later.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   Very few prose changes.

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   Headbomb's script lists TheStreet as a generally unreliable source. Is there something better?

   I've replaced the information from TheStreet with similar information from CNN. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Earwig is catching quotes and phrases like "of the Impossible Whopper".

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The last image might be a bit duplicative, but it's fine.

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

   Copy changes are minimal. Consider replacing TheStreet source. Ping me when done.

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Copy changes

• In Europe, Burger King introduced a different veggie burger in 2019, the Rebel Whopper, which is not made by Impossible Foods. Change comma after 2019 to colon to make reading just a bit easier.
  • Fixed. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
• According to the Tampa Bay Times, it uses 95% less land, 74% less water, and creates 87% fewer emissions Parallelism: make it "uses 95% less land and 74% less water and creates..."
  • Fixed. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Spot checks

• 1: The BK Nutrition Explorer is used for the nutrition facts. The facts are correctly reproduced on the page. Y
• 16: Finazzo said that the company considered a Beyond Meat burger but chose Impossible Foods for the taste, brand recognition and price. Y
• 29: At Burger King, which sells the Impossible Whopper, the plant-based alternative has been about $1 to $2 more expensive than a regular Whopper. Y
• 30: ...carries a slight price premium Y (Not sure why this is really here but)
• 40: The famous Impossible Whopper, which can be ordered vegan without the mayonnaise, became an instant hit for the company. Y

@Sammi Brie: Thanks for the review! It is indeed my first GA nomination, so hopefully I'm putting the replies in the right places. I've addressed the issues you raised. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.