Talk:Impressive (software)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Weegeerunner in topic Contested deletion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it is a well reviewed and renowned lightwight (console) pdf presentation software featuring 3D effects for free and open (source/cc) documentations like other Console applications and other Free presentation software. No WP:COI involved nor lack of asserted importance as sources reveal. Looked up User:WeeGeerunner reverts and left-mouse-button tickles by the minute, perhaps he should take a time out, read more or come back to simple content creation & editing? I realy don't know! Thank you. --Miraclexix (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Those sources do not seem reliable. The software is not renowned just because you say it is, and do not send Personal Attacks. Weegeerunner (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I did not personally attack you, please stick to Wikipedia:Civility and let us cooperate. You are right, the software is renowned not because of my oppinion, but because it had publicity in renowned media! The software was presented and published about in peer reviewed int. magazines and had been a discussion topic at int. FOSS conventions. It is one of _the_ presentation alternatives in my PC-BSD 10.1 machines - even my kids use it at school on their notebooks and promote the FOSS idea indirectly ('cause other kids asked about the cool presentation software). Everything is fine, thank you for your non-destructive cooperation --Miraclexix (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- ...and my gut feeling did not mislead me. As I reported, I got amazed how many revert-decisions and other decisions you did this day, in minutes, which partly, because of their very nature, did not last long. Your request for speedy deletion (CSD A7) of my work did not last long, likewise. Every thing is fine, again, thank you. --Miraclexix (talk) 21:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I did not personally attack you, please stick to Wikipedia:Civility and let us cooperate. You are right, the software is renowned not because of my oppinion, but because it had publicity in renowned media! The software was presented and published about in peer reviewed int. magazines and had been a discussion topic at int. FOSS conventions. It is one of _the_ presentation alternatives in my PC-BSD 10.1 machines - even my kids use it at school on their notebooks and promote the FOSS idea indirectly ('cause other kids asked about the cool presentation software). Everything is fine, thank you for your non-destructive cooperation --Miraclexix (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- You directly insulted how I edit and tried to paint me as a disruptive editor. That is a personal attack. Please stop disparaging me. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)