Talk:Improv Toronto

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Peer Review by OlYeller21

edit

Keep in mind that I'm very new to Wiki so my opinions should be taken with a grain of salt.

It looks good to me. You might want to add an infobox on the right side to make it look a little better. From what I've typically seen on Wiki, every sentence above the index but below the first sentence (in this case) should be below the index box and have its own section for each topic (new coverage, beliefes, etc.). Lastly, in your list of news coverage, you mentioned a blog. As I just recently ran into issues with citing a blog (even though you only named it and didn't add a reference), blogs can't be used as references because of Verifiability.

Again, it looks like a really good start and I hope my newby commentary helps or at least gets the ball rolling.

Good luck! OlYellerTalktome 20:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Improv Toronto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply