Talk:Imre Menyhay

SOURCES and Control through the books ISBN number:

1. • Website of the University of West Hungary. Faculty of Economic Sciences, Colleagues.
2. • Bologna and accreditation biographies available at the University of West Hungary.
3. • Google on 28.07.2012: Menyhay Imre: roughly 10100 results. Emmerich Menyhay: roughly 2100 results.
4. • Encyclopedia “Pedagógiai Ki Kicsoda 1997” (Who Is Who In Pedagogy 1997) (Kereban Kiadó)
5. • Encyclopedia “Ki Kicsoda a magyar gazdasági életben 2001” (Who Is Who in Hungarian Economic Life 2001) (Humexin-kiadó)
6. • Encyclopedia “Who’s Who in the World” USA, Marquis Who’s Who 2008-
7. • Mária Tompa (Ed): Égő katedra. Visszaemlékezések Szentkuthy Miklósra (A Chair on Fire. Remembering Miklós Szentkuthy), Hamvas Béla Institute for Cultural Research 2001, 153-159.
8. • History Office: Secret Interior Ministry File O_1383. Student organizations.

• !!!!!!!!!!! ISSN and ISBN number of boocks  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There are enough possibilities of control. Menyhay is a well known figure in Europe. Some of his books are also available on microfilm in the United States. The goal is to improve and not just deleting! Encyclopedia “Who’s Who in the World” USA, Marquis Who’s Who 2008- and Website of the University of West Hungary. Faculty of Economic Sciences, Colleagues is written in English, and this should really be enough for the credibility of the data. Menyhay is in German and Hungarian Wikipédia. Why Menyhay is for the English Wikipedia is not good enough? Do you think the Europeans accept someone who does not have to qualify?

The number of Google hits has not occurred by chance, and if you would have wanted it, you had a lot of data about Imre (Emmerich) Menyhay can find, but I understand that it takes time for investigating and you will not always be necessary time to do so. You can put everything in order if you want it. Friendly greetings from

Veitsberger--Veitsberger (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Remain calm. The article is not nominated for deletion. I tagged it for lacking sources, because it lacks sources. The author did not follow the Wikipedia guidelines to provide sources for verification of the facts in this biography of a living person. Technically, the article could have been deleted for that fault, but I chose not to propose that because my own Google search did reveal a lot of information. However, I was not in a position to sift through all of that information (largely written in Hungarian) to be able to use the information to improve the article, so instead I tagged the article for improvement so that the original author or other editors might take the needed action. Since Veitsberger (talk · contribs) has done the work to find all of these sources, I suggest that he do the further work to incorporate them meaningfully into the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I am glad that you have yourself investigated in Google and saw that Imre Menyhay is a well known personality.

At the end of the original article in English, the sources in English are listed. I have done nothing else, as the sources listed there and you repeatedly drawn attention. There are two English-language sources in the sources, a glossary, and the website of the West Hungarian University, which represent the life work of Imre Menyhay almost completely. Those who go beyond written Hungarian and only the titles were translated into English. Obviously you can not expect that the two Hungarian lexicons, the book about the contacts with the Kossuth Prize-winner Szentkuthy or History Office: Secret Interior Ministry File O_1383. Student organizations the Communist State Police is translated into English and will be sent as proof.

The sources of this type have been accepted in the Hungarian and German Wikipedia. I suppose that it is also good enough for the English Wikipedia. Possibly yes, because otherwise you would not have wrote that I - have shown the necessary resources satisfactory - Veitsberger. So, so this part of the problem would be settled.

Unfortunately, the author of the article does not answer anymore. He can obviously good English. I can not english. It's hard to find someone who can good English and can help you. It would be sufficient if the original article is adapted to the existing requirements. And you could do it best. I ask.

Veitsberger--Veitsberger (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello!

Karmela of the Hungarian Wikipedia has used the sources. I cut the article and trying to get the text in the form. I have quoted from the books only Hungarian and German titles in brackets, the English meaning of the title. Is it okay? Or should I delete them? I'm still working. Sincerely yours

Veitsberger--212.183.77.9 (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)