Talk:In Concert (Apo Hiking Society album)
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Lenticel (talk · contribs) on 22 March 2022. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
An image on this page may be deleted
editThis is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:APO (in concert).jpg, found on In Concert (Apo Hiking Society album), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 14:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Requested move 22 October 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED.(non-admin closure) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
In Concert (Apo Hiking Society album) → In Concert $%*!? – Technically closer title that does not require disambiguation. – Pppery 21:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 10:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Pppery: Stylization rather than part of the name? Who is going to remember the sequence of characters in it? The exact wanted title was In Concert #$%*!? (Apo Hiking Society album), but the # had to be omitted for technical reason.Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose this is an Apo Hiking Society album, the actual full symbols used on the album cover graphics with # are impossible anyway. Leave at recognizable title. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: Are you arguing that the {{correct title}} hatnote at the top should be removed? Pppery 12:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- There don't seem to be sources for that note. But as it stands that note title cannot be produced as a title anyway. Can any third party WP:RS reliable sources be added? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TM. Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration. wbm1058 (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.