Talk:In Praise of Limestone
![]() | In Praise of Limestone has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2007. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I've noticed that internet pages offering this poem all use the word "incomprehensible" instead of "comprehensible", so are wrong at least once. –Outriggr ♠ 05:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Good Article
editThis is a very thoughtful piece which clearly meets all the GA criteria. Very good work! Johnfos 06:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Auden's revisions
editIt may be worthwhile to have a discussion of Auden's revisions of this poem-- the original edition, which is still extant in some places has the following
What could be more like Mother or a fitter background For her son, the flirtatious male who lounges Against a rock in the sunlight displaying his dildo, never doubting[10] That for all his faults he is loved; whose works are but Extensions of his power to charm? … (ll. 11–15)
Auden often had second thoughts about his poems and on occaision would revise them-- September1,1939 being a notorious example, where he excised whole stanzas and then finally wanted to ditch the whole poem. The noted poet and critic David Lehman frequently criticized his revisions and had a preference for his orignal works.Bwthemoose 16:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I did mention this in the footnote on the replaced line, but feel free to add an explanation in the text itself. –Outriggr § 20:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)