Talk:In Which We Meet Mr. Jones/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 00:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Moar Fringe?

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Prose is fine, MOS is grand.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Citations are all in order, nothing wrong here,

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope is just right, not too much either way.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrality is fine.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Stable and uncontroversial

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Sole image used is fine, free from commons. Article should really have a lead image though, can we get a low-res screenshot to illustrate it?

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   All in all, I'm going to pass this as a Good Article. I don't think the lack of a lead image is enough to prevent its promotion.

Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 talk 02:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)