Talk:In de gloria

Misinformation

La situación es absolutamente cierta.

what does the sentence above me mean? and hey, on YouTube, numerous dutch people say that they saw the show and it was real. Is it a fake, or not?85.127.93.168 (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Those Dutch people are misinformed. It's a Belgian comedy sketch. --Caustic Armadillo (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

"La situación es absolutamente cierta." is Spanish for "the situation is absolutely true" as referring to the real existence of the Boomerang sketch. Thanks for editing the last piece of the article I added yesterday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.88.25 (talk) 11:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Nowadays, the sketch has become a legend, and most of people believe it was a real incident. The Dutch people mentioned above are undoubtely lying. It happens a lot everywhere. In Spain, an anonimous person wrote on the Internet that the musical group called "La Oreja de Vangogh" (Vangogh's ear) said in a TV program that they were supporting economically a real spanish terrorist group. Some people even posted en many blogs that they were spectators on that program. Don't trust everything you find on the Internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.37.229.180 (talk) 01:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

"The interview was NOT asketch.. it was absolutely real... the interviewer even lost his job, and there's an interview with him a few years later where he expresses his regret and apologizes, because it ruined his TV career and he ended up doing only radio, as no one would hire him on TV... it's even available on youtube... I've seen it, in my native tongue, and it is 100 percent real.. he even talks about how many people mistake it for a "sketch".. this article is INCORRECT and should be corrected immediately ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.13.208 (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Are those 'Cast' links really OK?!

Is it OK (meaning accepted/allowed by Wikipedia rules and guidelines) that all the links under Cast section link to Dutch Wikipedia with no obvious indication (i.e. they look as if they would link to articles on English Wikipedia)?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In de gloria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927014919/http://www.nieuwsblad.be/Article/Detail.aspx?articleID=GV116TGRC to http://www.nieuwsblad.be/Article/Detail.aspx?articleID=GV116TGRC

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)