Talk:In re Sealed Case No. 02-001
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Drkersdeofgry in topic Technical
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editDisagree on Merger
editI disagree that In re Sealed Case should be merged into the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review article. The decision was historic and separate. Perhaps if there were hundreds of disclosures, a "greatest hits" section could be added to the article. But, as it stands now, I recommend the articles not be merged. Saebvn (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Technical
editI tagged this page as technical. It has way too much legal terminology and fails to explain what the decision means in common language. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:13, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
>In process of expanding and explaining in common language. Drkersdeofgry (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)