Talk:Independent Network Charismatic Christianity

A fact from Independent Network Charismatic Christianity appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that leaders within the Independent Network Charismatic Christianity movement do not aim to grow churches, but rather seek to influence the "seven mountains of culture"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Independent Network Charismatic Christianity.

Wikipedia

Christianity: Charismatic / Evangelical Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Evangelical Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Refimprove template

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I have removed the refimprove template placed by FULBERT. I do not believe that there are insufficient inline citations to support the current content of the article. The article includes references to two academic books published by Oxford University Press and Fortress Press, a BBC radio documentary and an article from the Los Angeles Review of Books. As far as I can see, there is currently no unreferenced content in the article. I would be interested to hear from FULBERT why they thought this tag was appropriate and I'd be more than happy to work on any issues identified. WJ94 (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think the issue may be the formatting of the in-line references. I'll work on that shortly. Nowa (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nowa. I am wondering why you've changed the article's citation style; there was nothing wrong with the original citation style and you have introduced errors with your edits. Per WP:CITEVAR, I'd ask you to restore the original citation style and discuss this change first. WJ94 (talk) 11:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't finished, but OK. I will restore. Nowa (talk) 23:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I appreciate it. WJ94 (talk) 09:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic