Talk:India Ferrah/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 17:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Under "Early life" and "Personal life" you refer to Ferrah as "he", but the "Career" section refers to India Ferrah as "she". . — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

   Maile66, Please look again. In the "Early life" and "Personal life" sections, I refer to "Richardson" to "he", and in the "Career" section I refer to Ferrah as "she". I know this can be a bit confusing, but right now the standard for drag performers on Wikipedia is to use preferred pronouns for individuals in- and out-of drag. There have been many discussions about this, and I'm curious if User:Armadillopteryx might care to provide a summary or current status of those discussions? In short, I'd say this article is consistent with other drag queens articles, if that helps with your GA review. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. — Maile (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

1. B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   Needs sourcing for 2011 Drag Race television — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

   Maile66, The article's prose says "India Ferrah competed on the third season (2011) of RuPaul's Drag Race" and has a citation. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This easily passes review. Thank you for your quick responses. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.