Talk:Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some of IPCB's work is international (it's certainly national in scope within US) and there are 14,000 G-hits for it. So I think it's notable enough.--Mereda 13:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Logical fallacy in the very pretense of the purpose and aim of the organization?

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This entire entity seems to exist for the same thing they did to the Genographic project, to create legal trouble to resist genetic testing of native Americans so they cannot be traced to roots outside of the Americas (i.e. to Africa, as with all humans according to the trends in scientific thinking today).

If they believe they honestly have been in the Americas for all time, they wouldn't resist a genetics test. If they did not believe in genetics or believed the interpretation of genetic results is currently incorrect they'd fight it on that level with their own theory and not care what genetics might show; They do none of this; their position obviously gives lie to their consideration that there is an objective nature in genetic testing by resisting it in such a way. The organization serves an innate logical fallacy in that it is a transparently mendacious prostituting of a false reality to serve their interests on false pretenses that are revealed by their very position. It isn't that any one of their positions isn't defensible, but rather that their approach is made in a paradoxically indefensible way. 67.5.158.1 (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I diasgree with this. The orgnization has many programs other than opposition to genetic testing. They all relate to defense against attacks on indigenous cultures via appropriation of genes, agricutural products, remains, and so on. You may not like it, but it is not logically inconsistent. And even if it were, its influence warrants the article. Please consult their web site.StN (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

They sound like the Abrahamic creationists who refuse to accept evolution. Should this be listed under psuedoscience? JanderVK (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060522170645/http://www.biodiv.org/programmes/socio-eco/traditional/instruments.aspx?grp=STA to http://www.biodiv.org/programmes/socio-eco/traditional/instruments.aspx?grp=STA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

No Criticism?

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article is about a political-activist organization but it currently has no criticism, dissenting or oposing views. They have strong, controversial (negative) opinions on genetic science. Some of what they advocate, re: traditional beliefs, verges on a sort of creationism. Surely some adequately-sourced material can be found, disagreeing with their views? 172.97.137.237 (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic