Talk:Indonesia–Papua New Guinea relations

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Curious?

edit

Anyone requiring extra background as to this article might like to wade through the talk page of Western_New_Guinea - which can give quite an operatic panorama of emotion and coliur and opinion on the part of some editors - well worth the read if you are short of background and issues SatuSuro 11:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


Merge proposal

edit

Into New Guinea article - it is not relevant to merge this article into the New Guinea article. There is a good range of online material to utilise to expand this article as a stand alone article with adequate supply of WP RS SatuSuro 02:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indonesia–Papua New Guinea relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply