Talk:Induced path

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I suggest we make a separate article for induced cycles. Any objections? -Lyonsam (talk) 02:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I concur that a separate article for induced cycles would be best. Also, try to avoid using the word induced in the definition. To define an induced path as an induced subgraph conveys almost no new information. Sloughin (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reduction from independent set to longest induced path is wrong. The induced subgraph in H is a biclique, not a path. -10:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.103.146.47 (talk)

"Chordless cycle." Hmm... I can figure out what this means but it's not a happy terminology because the natural response to that phrase is: of course it's chordless---if it had a chord, it wouldn't be a cycle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.196.81.104 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Another possible name for the induced cycle page (which I agree should be separate from induced paths) would be hole (graph theory) (currently one of the redirects to here). —David Eppstein (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Induced path. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply