Talk:Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

A fact from Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories conducted more than one-third of all toxicology testing in the United States before it was discovered to have engaged in extensive scientific misconduct?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories.

Wikipedia

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Toxicology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Toxicology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Additional sources for consideration

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Safety Problem: A Lab's Troubles Raise Doubts About Quality Of Drug Tests in U.S.; IBT Flunks Federal Exam, Loses Clients, and Causes A Furor in the Industry; Were There Deliberate Slips? Safety Problem: A Lab's Troubles Raise Doubts About Drug Testing. The Wall Street Journal (February 21, 1978, p. 1)
Sacramento Bee, October 1983
Doctor denies knowledge of faked lab data. Chicago Tribune. (September 15, 1983)
EPA study finds that 2/3 of all tests conducted by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories to establish safety of 212 pesticides and herbicides now on market are invalid. The New York Times (May 12, 1983, p. 1)
Pesticides Fact Book
'Tested' pesticides' safety still in doubt. Chicago Tribune (May 3, 1981, p. B13)
Faulty data put pesticide safety in doubt. Chicago Sun-Times (March 17, 1991)
HARVEST OF POISON THE CHEMICALS IN OUR FOOD LAX REGULATIONS CITED BY CRITICS. Albany Times Union (May 17, 1987)
"Fraud...Again!" Boston Globe (June 1, 1983, p.7)
Since the Giant Fell. Linda Garmon. Sci. News, Vol 120 #1. (July 4, 1981)
Decision and Emergency Order Suspending the Registrations of All Pesticide Products Containing Dinoseb, 51 Fed. Reg. 36,634, 36,634 (Oct. 14, 1986)

— C M B J 14:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030132754/http://www.monsanto.com/products/Documents/glyphosate-background-materials/ibt_craven_bkg.pdf to http://www.monsanto.com/products/Documents/glyphosate-background-materials/ibt_craven_bkg.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic